PURELY (non) POLITICAL
Loveable, tangible, crinkly, immediate, pungent and messy newsprint is going the way of the Dodo Bird; extinction is in the forecast. But wait...
Thoughts on the Death of our Newspaper World
Say what you will about newsprint, its admirers are many and its life has been long.
Newsprint, as you may know, is produced by the harvesting of millions of youngish pine trees whose lives will be cut short in order to be ground up into pulp. That pulp is then fabricated into large rolls of newsprint and eventually placed upon giant rollers of an enormous (and expensive) web-fed press (frequently German-made) to become a newspaper.
The New York Times owns a giant forest in Canada that is devoted solely to the planting and harvesting of pine trees for use as newsprint for the Times.
But, much as Mark Twain was quoted as having said upon reading his obituary, “Reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated,” that may also be true of at least the remnants that remain: community weeklies, many of which continue to thrive.
From what I hear, chances are real that the Dodo bird is about to be re-animated via DNA, and vinyl LPs have enjoyed a rebirth, so newsprint’s demise may too have been “greatly exaggerated.”
I grew up in a small city in Massachusetts with newsprint. As a ten-year-old newspaper delivery boy for the Lowell Sun, I spent many a Sunday Morning on my new Schwinn Birthday Bike delivering the very large (and prosperous) Sunday edition of the Lowell Sun. Over the course of two years or so, my route went from 41 to 123 customers, many of whom expected me to have change on me when it came time for them to pay up. I frequently ran out of the correct change, so they’d tell me to come back another day.
Grrrr.
Some never had the money and others “forgot” to pay me week after week.
But, hey, I was in the newspaper business!
I sold the L.A. Free Press on the streets of Hollywood in the mid-1960s. I think I asked for a quarter and kept a dime, and touted it as “the paper that used those four-letter words,” but that memory is fuzzy. It was, after all, a free paper.
I walked up and down from Fleet Street to Oxford Street in London wearing the two-sided London Evening Standard headline-of-the-day on my shoulders and over my chest and back to earn extra money. I even became managing editor of the failing New York Free Press at the tender age of 24.
When The New York Times – in full flower and making money by the bucketload – bought the Santa Barbara News-Press in 1984, that was the signal of the beginning of the end of newsprint.
It wasn’t obvious then, but the Times’ staff didn’t know this city and, frankly, didn’t much care about it either. Editors and publishers come and go, just as sports figures do in the majors now. Not in my day. If Jimmy Piersall or Ted Williams ever jumped ship from the Boston Red Sox to another team, particularly the New York Yankees, when I was a kid, a never-ending riot would have ensued. Those players were ours, nobody else’s. And riots would not have been contained in Boston. Every city in Massachusetts big and small, would have been outraged and crushed in equal measure. New England really is a small town.
Today, when a newspaper fails, the universal reaction is: Meh.
As far as a statement on the current sad circumstances of the Santa Barbara News-Press, well, we’ve all seen it coming for at least the past decade. The staff of the News-Press walked out onto De La Guerra Plaza in 2006 wearing Duct Tape over their mouths because the paper’s new owner, Wendy McCaw, had the audacity to remove an item concerning a high-profile Montecito resident (Rob Lowe). That the item could have breached the security of the actor’s new home didn’t matter. Apparently, the staff felt that the owner/publisher of the paper had no right to interfere with the editorial content of the paper.
Which is/was absurd.
That attitude probably only accelerated the death of most papers that have folded over the course of this decades-long abandonment of print. Dailies were mostly run by absentee corporate ownership and headed up by well-paid editors whose inflated salaries eventually became untenable.
That nearly all mainstream dailies – the News-Press being a notable exception – spew the same kind of mind-numbing garbage “written” by uninterested and uncurious “reporters” and “editors” in lockstep with each other is another reason, but really, the days of a subscription-based daily newspaper are/were numbered anyway. How could they possibly compete selling high-priced ads and paying giant-sized printing costs in the face of the competition that charges pennies and only when someone responds to an ad?
Community weeklies in this area (Santa Barbara Independent, Montecito Journal, Carpinteria’s Coastal View News) continue to thrive in the face of the Internet onslaught, and all make certain they stay connected to their community. But only their readers’ and advertisers’ continuing support will keep them that way.
So, say good-bye to newsprint wistfully, as we’ve said so-long, see ya later, bye-bye to so many of our favorite things, such as former lovers, eclairs with real crème patissiere and chocolate ganache, honey-glazed doughnuts with real honey, maple in maple syrup, cocaine in Coke, and, well, you know the thing…
Nice tribute. As online a guy as I’ve become I still love picking up and leafing thru the local newspapers.
Love it